73.8 F
Indianapolis
Thursday, April 18, 2024

Breaking the cycle: Why poverty can be a closed loop with few chances for escape

More by this author

In a big ballroom at Indiana University Southeast, sociologist Melissa Fry and her colleagues arranged tables with signs on them around the perimeter. Each station represented a certain service, including a school, a bank, a social services office, a grocery store and a hospital.

ā€œBut then thereā€™s also like a payday loan kind of place. Thereā€™s also a pawn shop,ā€ said Fry, the director of Applied Research and Education Center at IU Southeast.Ā 

After setting up, Fry and her colleagues recruited participants to take part in a ā€œpoverty simulation.ā€ Their goal was to inspire empathy, sensitize service providers and demonstrate the daily stresses facing people living in poverty.

The stations were staffed by Hoosiers living in poverty day in and day out. One week in real life equaled 15 minutes in the simulation.Ā 

Shocking reality

ā€œAt the end of the simulation, [participants] join the group for a debrief discussion,ā€ Fry said. ā€œAnd sometimes youā€™ll have participants say, ā€˜Well, I donā€™t think itā€™s really like that.ā€™ā€

At this point, some low-income volunteers explained to the participants that it is actually a lot harder than the simulation suggests. According to Fry, participants walked away with similar feelings ā€” anxiety, stress, anger and an overwhelming feeling that, from the get-go, the cards were stacked against them.

The exercise at IU Southeast was a snapshot of what more than 700,000 Hoosiers living in poverty face each day. Researchers point to systemic issues that make it difficult for many of the stateā€™s poor to break the cycle of poverty.Ā 

Nutrition and child care: Poverty deters essential businesses

According to a 2019 SAVI study, 80,000 Indianapolis residents live in zones of concentrated poverty, areas where the poverty rate is at least 40%.Ā 

Higher rates of poverty in a neighborhood deter many essential businesses from opening, according to SAVI analysts.

Unai Miguel Andres, a research analyst at SAVI, put it this way: ā€œCapitalism is great for the economy, but not necessarily for the human need.ā€

Andres gave ā€œfood desertsā€ as an example of how poor neighborhoods fare in a capitalist system. Food deserts are areas where there is little access to healthy food options because of the absence ofĀ grocery stores. Neighborhoods that qualify as food deserts are also low-income ones, according to the United States Department of Agriculture definition.Ā 

ā€œGrocery stores are businesses that want to make profit,ā€ Andres said. ā€œIf they see that by opening in a certain neighborhood they wonā€™t turn in enough profit, they just wonā€™t open there.ā€

He said high speed broadband technology, and other services that require an investment by private corporations, are also subject to profit motives.

Research shows that the care children receive in the first years of life is crucial to their long-term well-being and future success. Fry of IU Southeast said child care services follow a similar pattern in many of Indianaā€™s poorest neighborhoods. She has studied some of the stateā€™s poorest neighborhoods and found that there is a dearth of such essential services.

ā€œQuality child care in low-income markets is almost impossible, because the market doesnā€™t work. Thereā€™s no effective demand for high quality care because people canā€™t pay enough for high quality care,ā€ Fry said.Ā 

Public education: The great equalizer or a tool to further segregation?

Education is one of the tools that canĀ break the cycle of poverty, according to Zahava Stadler, special assistant for state funding and policy at the Education Trust.Ā 

But she says studies show things are not looking up when it comes to educating the poorest in a city like Indianapolis.Ā 

ā€œOur education system has a long way to go before it fulfills the promise of being the great equalizer,ā€ Stadler said. ā€œBecause too much about the structural nature of our school funding system just reinforces and entrenches existing inequalities in our communities.ā€

The general idea that many have on school funding is that it comes from property taxes, which Stadler says is partially true. But there is also a complex formula that most states use to allocate funding based on the need of each school. States look at how much property tax each school district is able to generate and then give the districts more money to reach funding needs. While itā€™s not a perfect process and has loopholes, it largely works in many states, Stadler said.

ā€œThey basically try and rebalance things to a degree so that local wealth doesnā€™t become destiny for school districts,ā€ she said.

But thatā€™s not how it works in Indiana.

ā€œBecause Indiana doesnā€™t do step two,ā€ Stadler said.ā€œWhat they do is they say, ā€˜OK, hereā€™s your funding target. We use our formula to determine the districtā€™s funding target, and then we give you that money. ā€˜So thereā€™s no accounting for local wealth. And what happens is that everybody agrees on the ground that the money the state gives them is not enough.ā€

This leaves poor neighborhoods with low property values, and in return, meager property tax amounts for under-funded and under-resourced public schools.

Low reimbursement for medical practicesĀ 

According to the Economic Policy Institute, high concentration of poverty in a neighborhood leads to disparities and inequality across the board. Health care is no exception.

As many as 9% of Hoosiers are uninsured ā€” making them unable to afford health care. In addition, poor neighborhoods have higher rates of residents who depend on Medicaid and Medicare.

ā€œThe reality is that for doctors offices, itā€™s hard to make a practice work on just Medicare, Medicaid, because the reimbursement rate is so low,ā€ Fry of IU said. ā€œThatā€™s the capitalism part, right?ā€

Stalled integration efforts

One way to ensure that poor Hoosiers ā€” children and adults alike ā€” are not destined to depend on subpar public services, such as education and health care, is integration.

ā€œIf you spread individuals with lower purchasing power within neighborhoods in combination with people that have access to more capital or more money to be able to purchase products or services, that means the services are going to be more spread out,ā€ Andres of SAVI said.Ā 

Federal programs aiming to make neighborhoods less segregated can be a step in the right direction, but they do not always work as expected.Ā 

For example, a program that provides housing vouchers or rental assistance to low-income people instead of offering housing units ā€” to allow them to seek housing in mixed income neighborhoodsā€”seems to be stalling for many reasons, Fry of IU Southeast said.Ā 

According to Fry, one problem facing some poor residents using these housing assistance programs is feeling like social pariahs in wealthier areas. Racism against Black residents deters many from relocating to more prosperous, usually predominantly white, neighborhoods.

ā€œThe other problem we actually see in southern Indiana is that a lot of landlords donā€™t want to take those vouchers for a couple of reasons,ā€ Fry said. ā€œThe federal government has placed pretty significant standards on property owners in terms of how they have to maintain the apartments, which obviously should be safe, but some of the requirements are really onerous, and making it difficult for landlords to want to participate.ā€Ā 

She said these vouchers can be ineffective if poor residents canā€™t find a place to use them.

Chain reaction

A 2015 study by the IU Richard M. Fairbanks School of Public Health and SAVI shows that zip codes in Indianapolis a few miles apart have a huge gap in life expectancy.Ā 

Residents of wealthy neighborhoods in the metro area live up to 83.7 years ā€” similar to countries such as Switzerland and Japan. In a poor neighborhood less than 30 miles away, residents live up to 69.4 years ā€” less than countries such as Iraq and Bangladesh.

Tess Weathers, a research associate at IU who led the study, said this disparity is largely due to the unfair and different lives that Americans lead due to systemic racism, disparities in accumulated capital and where they live.

ā€œAnd the ownership is not solely on individuals, which is often the thing we do in America. We place the ownership on individuals,ā€ Weathers said. ā€œSociety, we as an entire country, or as a state, need to take responsibility for our role in that.ā€

This story was reported as part of a partnership between WFYI, Side Effects Public Media and the Indianapolis Recorder. Contact Farah Yousry at fyousry@wfyi.org or 857-285-0449. Follow her on Twitter @Farah_Yoursrym.

- Advertisement -
ads:

Upcoming Online Townhalls

- Advertisement -

Subscribe to our newsletter

To be updated with all the latest local news.

Stay connected

1FansLike
1FollowersFollow
1FollowersFollow
1SubscribersSubscribe

Related articles

Popular articles

EspaƱol + Translate Ā»
Skip to content